Archive for November, 2007

Prayer request

Kasia November 30th, 2007

As the potential understatement of the year, this is not good. There’s a hostage situation at Hillary Clinton’s campaign headquarters.

I hope and pray this is resolved without bloodshed. Apparently the hostage-taker released a young woman with a baby, so he’s not without mercy. Please God, let this just be a slightly unhinged guy who wants a platform, not one who will kill anyone – himself included – to get it.

** UPDATE ** Deo gratias, that seems to have been exactly the case. Not even a real bomb – just road flares duct taped to his chest.

“I can has Eucharist? kthx”?!??!?

Kasia November 27th, 2007

I am sure that this would offend me if I could only stop laughing…

Curtsy to Mark Shea. Also curtsy to the combox commentator HokiePundit, who submitted the following for our reading enjoyment:

   Oh hai. I confected you a Eucharist but I ated it.

Too cute…

Kasia November 23rd, 2007

I have several nieces and nephews. Two of my nieces were at the family Thanksgiving shindig yesterday. One is turning seven in a couple of days, and the other is (I believe) five.

My stepsister was asking The Canuck and me questions about the wedding. The seven year old was in the room, and her mom said “You know that [Clam] and [Canuck] are getting married, right?”

“NO!???!”

“Yeah, they’re getting married.”

[shocked look] “I just knew they were ENGAGED, that’s all!”

I guess that’s a good object lesson in the importance of common vocabulary.

It may not be illegal, but it’s still disgusting.

Kasia November 19th, 2007

I can’t summarize this right now. I should be working, but I saw this and it made me so mad I had to post.

What the **** kind of mother creates a fake MySpace account to fake out her daughter’s friend or former friend, poses as a teenage boy who’s interested in said friend or former friend, manipulates the girl (who by the way has emotional problems) into trusting “him”, then starts posting nasty messages about the friend or former friend, which culminate in the girl committing suicide?!

I don’t know what transpired between Megan Meier (the girl who committed suicide) and her former friend. I don’t know precisely what the other girl’s mother said to Megan posing as Josh, or vice versa.

But I do know that this kind of **** is NOT how you teach your child to act. And this unnamed mother involved her daughter in the hoax.

I don’t care whether it’s legal. I care that this is an absolutely inexcusable way for someone who’s supposed to be an adult to behave. If the daughter had cooked it up and carried it out, it would still be cruel, but I could say “Well, she IS only 14.” There’s a reason we have diminished culpability for things you do before certain ages. It’s because society says that you’re young enough, have had little enough opportunity to develop your judgment, that we shouldn’t hit you with the full force of the law.

But if this woman has a 14-year-old daughter, even assuming she was a verrrry young mother, she’s almost certainly at least 30. Odds are she’s pushing 40. She is quite old enough to know better.

I’m embarrassed.

Kasia November 19th, 2007

The Canuck already knows that I identify my neighbors primarily by their pets. Oh, not so much the people in my immediate building; I know their names and faces. But when I’m out walking around the neighborhood, I recognize the dogs first and foremost, and then I might be able to successfully identify the people.

In my old neighborhood there was the full-sized Schnauzer, Harry. I forget his owner’s name offhand, but in my defense I *did* know it when I lived there. And there was Mickey, the little Shih Tzu. His owner was named Anne, but I learned that much later than I learned the dog’s name.

In my new neighborhood, there’s the Brittany spaniel, Austin. I don’t know his person’s name, but whenever I see him I shout “AUSTIN!” for all the city to hear. I then pet him, and say hello to whoever’s walking him, which is sometimes his owner and sometimes a friend of hers.

Then there’s Summer, the little miniature chihuahua, whose person I don’t know. And Gracie, the big Golden Retriever-looking dog who’s also 1/3 wolf, whose person I don’t know either.

There’s Daphne, the little black dog with a white patch on her chest. Is she ever a lovebug! She is just too sweet for words! Her owner, a woman about my age, actually recognized me in Kroger and identified herself to me as my neighbor. I couldn’t place her at all until she said she was Daphne’s owner. Boy, was my face red! (But I still don’t remember her name…)

Now, seeing as I know I have this issue, I do try to make a point of remembering faces and names. But when my primary interaction with someone is via the Internet, sometimes it’s difficult.

I recognize Mrs. Kheldar without a problem. I can even place her (tie face to name and how I know her) in five seconds or less, usually less, which for me with someone I primarily interact with online is pretty darned good.

However, I think I may have discovered yesterday that I use that associative memory (pairing people with their dogs, cats, kids, or spouse) a little too much. I am pretty sure I saw Matt S., a.k.a. Kheldar, at the parish town hall meeting yesterday. I saw him. I knew he looked familiar. But I wasn’t sure.

And then it hit me: I have never seen him without at least one of his children around. Usually Lily at least is with him, and sometimes the others as well, to say nothing of Mrs. Kheldar.

So Matt, if that was you, please accept my heartfelt apologies. Mea maxima culpa.

Talk about the wrong focus…

Kasia November 14th, 2007

So being the hyper-Martha that I am wont to be about such things, I’ve been cruising looking for wedding planning information. (I especially need to be proactive and hyper-Martha because we’re on a tight budget.)

Take a look at this.

The Canuck and I are really working hard at focusing on the sacrament and the marriage rather than the wedding (even though I’ve already had a few borderline psychotic moments where I was clicking and printing like…well, a madwoman). Riddle me this: in what bizarre parallel universe should you have selected your site, caterer, videographer, photographer, florist, and musicians, PLUS registered for gifts, before you start thinking about your officiant?

I know I’m coming at this from a different perspective than many people do, in that I know rootin’-tootin’ well that I want to be married in the Church and which priest(s) I would like to have officiate, and the main decision is whether to have the wedding at my parish or my confessor’s parish. But think about this: Catholic marriage prep is a minimum of six months. Over a quarter of the population of this country identifies as Catholic, and a lot of other denominations have marriage prep too. Why is the officiant – the person who’s going to facilitate your marriage – only decided on AFTER you’ve chosen your site?

(I know, I know. So that Catholics – or others – who want to get married on the beach, in a cute little gazebo, in a glade in the woods, or at the Masonic Temple can disqualify anyone who’s unwilling to do that.)

My inner cynic is rearing her ugly head…

Since I’m having trouble concentrating on work…

Kasia November 13th, 2007

Last night I got to my evening job, and right by the big statue of St. Therese, guess what – a lilac tree was blooming!

Now, it’s pretty mild out at present, but I have no idea how lilac blossoms either survived from May until November or the tree decided to bloom. I don’t tend to see miracles behind every tree, but I decided there’s a reasonable chance that St. Therese was letting me know something. Still don’t know what it was or is – maybe she interceded for me and thus helped inspire The Canuck’s proposal on Sunday – but in any event, thank you St. Therese!  :-)

I’m tired and flighty this week, despite trying to get extra sleep. I suppose it’s normal to be distracted under the circumstances, but I didn’t expect to be quite so…aimless. However, it’s bound to pass soon, and I’ll be back to the turbocharged Martha.

Thursday evening The Canuck is going to come into town, and Friday we have appointments with my confessor (to get the ‘lay of the land’ in terms of what we need to be thinking about and what our options are) and an immigration lawyer (for the same reason). I’m feeling a little overwhelmed right now, but I think as we sit down with each person and actually sort through everything, I’ll feel better. Right now my wheels are just spinning like crazy, and I’m getting mental fatigue without going anywhere.

Reactions to the engagement have been varied, but almost uniformly positive. My aunt shouted “It’s about d*** time!” when I called and told her; my mother got weepy; Mere de Canuque was just pleasantly happy for us. The Big Seester was borderline weepy. My dad and stepmom were excited.

I guess the trick, as with most things, is to take it one thing at a time…

I demand a recount…

Kasia November 12th, 2007

NOT that there’s anything wrong with it…

…but I somehow don’t think I’m anything like the French. Except perhaps in that I take myself too seriously, but that’s really a holdover from my liberal upbringing…


Your Inner European is French!


Smart and sophisticated.
You have the best of everything – at least, *you* think so.

The New Math

Kasia November 12th, 2007

Let’s see. Somehow [Canuck] + [Clam] = [LUV].

And [Canuck + Clam] + [LUV] also = [happy Clam] + [happy Canuck]

And [happy Clam + happy Canuck] = [proposal]

Which all, in turn, equals [Talk to immigration lawyer, Talk to priest] (those are commutative, so order doesn’t matter)

And ultimately means [Canuck + Clam] = [engaged]

Anyone take enough Diff/EQ to make sense of that?

ROFL

Kasia November 9th, 2007

It would seem that a Boston priest has been accused of stalking Conan O’Brien. If the allegations are true, it sounds like the padre needs some psychiatric help and a lot of prayer.

However, true to form, the inimitable Tim Ferguson (also known as Our Friendly Neighborhood Canonist – and it’s true, he really DOES live in my neighborhood!) put a comment into the combox that is well worth reading. Who knew even this cloud could have the silver lining of a laugh?

Do you think sometimes that Satan has a committee (we all know there are committee meetings in hell) that sits around thinking up temptations and ways to embarass the Church?“Hmmmmm – I know! I could try to get this priest to start…ummmm molesting kids!”

“No, no. Already done. How about stealing money from the cemetery fund?”

“mmmm, did that too.”

“Liturgical abuse?”

“That’s soooo 80’s.”

“Hey guys, how about getting a priest to stalk a late night talk show host!?

“Sheesh! How absurd – where would we even find one that moronic. I mean yeah, formation has slipped a bit since the “old days” but you couldn’t get one of these guys to do something that stupid.”

“Yeah?”

“Yeah.”

“I’ll bet you two icecubes and a window fan I can get one to do it.”

“You’re on!”

Next »

Get your free Catholic Blog at StBlogs Catholic Blogs