1) Mom and dad pay for the BK with their credit card for their credit-challenged kid
2) The law firm makes sure the funds clear from the debtor’s card…then they write it off in the BK outside the window of time for a fraud claim in BK court. So basically it’s free for the client. Nice eh?
No, it’s not you. That seems to me to be the very definition of irony.
2 scenarios on why this happens:
1) Mom and dad pay for the BK with their credit card for their credit-challenged kid
2) The law firm makes sure the funds clear from the debtor’s card…then they write it off in the BK outside the window of time for a fraud claim in BK court. So basically it’s free for the client. Nice eh?
not at all