<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Clam Rampant &#187; Less-than-Christian snark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clamrampant.stblogs.com/category/less-than-christian-snark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clamrampant.stblogs.com</link>
	<description>One of the Good Shepherd's flock. Just hanging around, blogging, and eating my grass.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s a stupid question for you&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://clamrampant.stblogs.com/2008/11/12/heres-a-stupid-question-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://clamrampant.stblogs.com/2008/11/12/heres-a-stupid-question-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kasia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranky Clam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less-than-Christian snark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clamrampant.stblogs.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK. So at least one or two of the Big Three have expressed interest in getting some of the money from that big government bailout/stimulus package that passed back in what, September? Now, I&#8217;m not going to debate whether the package should have passed &#8211; even at the time I recognized that it was beyond [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. So at least one or two of the Big Three have expressed interest in getting some of the money from that big government bailout/stimulus package that passed back in what, September? Now, I&#8217;m not going to debate whether the package should have passed &#8211; even at the time I recognized that it was beyond my meager economic competence to evaluate, and now it&#8217;s moot anyway because it&#8217;s long since passed. My question is a little more basic.</p>
<p>According to the news report I heard this morning, the Big Three and our governor, Jennifer Granholm, are earnestly pressing for this. However, (the news reported), some people object because the funds shouldn&#8217;t be used to prop up companies that have grossly mismanaged their resources. I paraphrase, but that&#8217;s the gist.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my question: As I recall, the package was precipitated by the apparently impending failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, plus a few other financial institutions that had apparently either been instrumental in originating most of the mortgages that have since been deemed overly risky (you know, when they went into default &#8211; hindsight being 20/20 and all that) or had purchased them as investments (because we know risky investments NEVER fail and ALWAYS bring high returns)&#8230;doesn&#8217;t it seem like&#8230;well, you know&#8230;the package was <em>designed</em> for companies that have grossly mismanaged their resources? Or is it just me?</p>
<p>And now I hear the City of Detroit is trying to get in on the action. Well, they definitely qualify as having grossly mismanaged their resources&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clamrampant.stblogs.com/2008/11/12/heres-a-stupid-question-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
